Difference between revisions of "Database Management - David Court"

From Pnb
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== Current Tasks ==
 
== Current Tasks ==
  
'''Ongoing:'''<br/>
+
 
 +
== '''Ongoing:''' ==
 +
<br/>
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
 
'''BBOP'''<br/>
 
'''BBOP'''<br/>
Line 28: Line 30:
 
Reasons for performing this task:<br/>
 
Reasons for performing this task:<br/>
 
- The chlorophyll values in the original database were incorrect.  The chlorophyll values were taken from the IOP bottle-files that had been submitted to SeaBASS.  These were labeled as "chl_a", which is defined by SeaBASS as an HPLC product.  However, these are Flourometric measurements.  At some point, a script needs to be written to re-format these files and a they must then be re-submitted to SeaBASS.<br/>
 
- The chlorophyll values in the original database were incorrect.  The chlorophyll values were taken from the IOP bottle-files that had been submitted to SeaBASS.  These were labeled as "chl_a", which is defined by SeaBASS as an HPLC product.  However, these are Flourometric measurements.  At some point, a script needs to be written to re-format these files and a they must then be re-submitted to SeaBASS.<br/>
<br/>
 
 
- Many of the sample times are incorrect.  This creates inaccuracies when trying to match-up the different measurements.  Most of the problems are a result of submitting the data in local (Bermuda) time rather than GMT - as required by SeaBASS.  Other issues exist as a result of the technician's computer clock being incorrectly set - sometimes by an order of years.  Again, these data will ultimately have to edited and re-submitted to SeaBASS.<br/>
 
- Many of the sample times are incorrect.  This creates inaccuracies when trying to match-up the different measurements.  Most of the problems are a result of submitting the data in local (Bermuda) time rather than GMT - as required by SeaBASS.  Other issues exist as a result of the technician's computer clock being incorrectly set - sometimes by an order of years.  Again, these data will ultimately have to edited and re-submitted to SeaBASS.<br/>

Revision as of 16:34, 21 September 2011

Summary of My Position

Current Tasks

Ongoing:



BBOP
- Processing BBOP MicroPro data
- Formatting data for SeaBASS submissions
- Latest cruise: B171
- Submitted to SeaBASS: YES
- Data available on-line: YES

Plumes & Blooms
- Formatting processed CTD for SeaBASS submissions
- Processing and formatting PRR data for SeaBASS submissions
- Latest cruise: PB231
- Submitted to SeaBASS: NO
- Data available on-line: NO

New Tasks:

Re-organization of the BBOP database with the purpose of increasing the performance of the (in-situ) matchups
- imported all pigment measurements from SeaBASS
- organized all radiometric data (MER, SPMR, & MicrPro)
- organized all absorption data (ag, ad, ap & aph)

Reasons for performing this task:
- The chlorophyll values in the original database were incorrect. The chlorophyll values were taken from the IOP bottle-files that had been submitted to SeaBASS. These were labeled as "chl_a", which is defined by SeaBASS as an HPLC product. However, these are Flourometric measurements. At some point, a script needs to be written to re-format these files and a they must then be re-submitted to SeaBASS.
- Many of the sample times are incorrect. This creates inaccuracies when trying to match-up the different measurements. Most of the problems are a result of submitting the data in local (Bermuda) time rather than GMT - as required by SeaBASS. Other issues exist as a result of the technician's computer clock being incorrectly set - sometimes by an order of years. Again, these data will ultimately have to edited and re-submitted to SeaBASS.